IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS



NO. 74,648



 
EX PARTE BOBBY RAY HOLTS, Applicant



ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
FROM BELL COUNTY

Per Curiam.
 

OPINION


This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Ex Parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of aggravated assault and punishment was assessed at twenty years imprisonment. Applicant's conviction was affirmed on appeal. Holts v. State, No. 03-01-00580-CR (Tex. App.- Austin, delivered May 16, 2002, no pet.).

Applicant contends that he has been denied an opportunity to file a timely petition for discretionary review. The record supports Applicant's allegation.

Applicant is entitled to relief. The proper remedy is to return Applicant to the point at which he can file a petition for discretionary review. He may then follow the proper procedures in order that a meaningful petition for discretionary review may be filed. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits, including mandate, shall be calculated as if the Court of Appeals' decision had been rendered on the day the mandate of the Court in this cause issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to seek discretionary review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petition is filed in the Court of Appeals within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.

Applicant's remaining claims are dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).



DELIVERED: April 30, 2003

DO NOT PUBLISH